In that case, why do such women not fall within the Government’s guidelines as having high priority for DHPs? As my noble friend says, they do not. Although I have not been able to verify it myself, I understand that, as a result of that, in most local authorities they do not get such money because the money is not there. They certainly, I suspect, would not get it for nine months after and up to two months before, or something like 11 months’ continuous payment, because local authorities cannot run it. They use DHPs to deal with temporary, immediate emergencies. Therefore, if the Minister means what he says, he should be giving guidance to local authorities that this should be a priority consideration and he should back that with the necessary money, which is not there at the moment, to do so. However, I see that he is standing up, perhaps to respond to that.
Welfare Reform and Work Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Hollis of Heigham
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 25 January 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Welfare Reform and Work Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
768 c1131 Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2016-02-09 11:17:09 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-01-25/16012529000109
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-01-25/16012529000109
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-01-25/16012529000109