UK Parliament / Open data

Constitutional Convention Bill [HL]

Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bills on Friday, 11 December 2015, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Purvis of Tweed. The answering member was Lord Bridges of Headley.
Lords committee stage. Clauses 1 to 7 agreed to. Bill reported without amendment.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

767 cc1813-1830 

Session

2015-16

Department

Cabinet Office

Legislative stage

Committee stage

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Constitutional Convention Bill (HL) 2015-16
Monday, 1 June 2015
Bills
House of Lords

Proceeding contributions

Lord Steel of Aikwood | 767 cc1813-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I was not able to be present at Second Reading and wish to say a few words on the propo...

Lord Grocott | 767 cc1814-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I certainly have no intention of trying to remove Clause 2 from the Bill but this gives...


Show all contributions (34)
Lord Wallace of Saltaire | 767 cc1815-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, it is very good to hear the noble Lord, Lord Grocott, reassert yet again how deeply con...

Lord Grocott | 767 c1816 (Link to this contribution)

I am very sorry that the noble Lord no longer speaks in an official capacity on the Liberal Front...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 cc1816-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I did speak at Second Reading. The main point I made was that I thought the Bill was fa...

Lord Kerr of Kinlochard | 767 c1817 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I very much agree with the first two points made by the noble Lord, Lord Steel of Aikwo...

Lord Kerr of Kinlochard | 767 cc1817-9 (Link to this contribution)

The stand part debate? Very good. I support the Bill that the noble Lord, Lord Purvis of Tweed, h...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1819 (Link to this contribution)

Did the noble Lord notice that this very week, the Scottish Parliament sought to argue that the S...

Lord Kerr of Kinlochard | 767 c1819 (Link to this contribution)

I entirely agree with the noble Lord, Lord Forsyth, and look forward to agreeing with him again o...

Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town | 767 c1820 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, first, I concur with and emphasise the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Kerr, about t...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1820 (Link to this contribution)

Surely the noble Baroness would accept that this matter was decided by the clerk in the other pla...

Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town | 767 c1820 (Link to this contribution)

Indeed, but I understand that the Government were very happy to overturn the votes of this House,...

Lord Bridges of Headley | 767 c1820 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I will make just a few, short points. First, I again congratulate the noble Lord, Lord ...

Lord Purvis of Tweed | 767 cc1820-1 (Link to this contribution)

It is probably fair that I respond to some elements of this debate, and in so doing I thank, firs...

Lord Grocott | 767 c1821 (Link to this contribution)

Surely nothing in his proposal is from the perspective of the voter rather than the institution. ...

Lord Purvis of Tweed | 767 cc1821-2 (Link to this contribution)

Clause 4 indicates strongly that the composition of the convention is to be citizen led. If the t...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1822 (Link to this contribution)

On the point about the scope of Clause 2, will the noble Lord tell the House how many hours and h...

Lord Purvis of Tweed | 767 c1822 (Link to this contribution)

I cannot set that. Legislation cannot set that. Legislation can set what is a reasonable time for...

Lord Skelmersdale | 767 c1822 (Link to this contribution)

Before the noble Lord moves on to his next point—I am sure he has many more—does he agree that th...

Lord Purvis of Tweed | 767 cc1822-3 (Link to this contribution)

We can follow two models. It can be very short, like the Smith commission, which perhaps on refle...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1823 (Link to this contribution)

I did not plan to interrupt again, but as the noble Lord referred to me, what I said would be an ...

Lord Purvis of Tweed | 767 c1823 (Link to this contribution)

There is nothing in Clause 2 that would prevent that. On that point of broad consensus—

Lord Kerr of Kinlochard | 767 c1823 (Link to this contribution)

The trouble with overspecifying, as Clause 2 does, is that you require people, before they report...

Lord Purvis of Tweed | 767 c1823 (Link to this contribution)

As a Liberal Democrat, I never want to move away from the high ground of principle. The noble Lor...

Lord Hughes of Woodside | 767 c1824 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Hughes of Woodside

1: After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause—<...

Lord Hughes of Woodside | 767 cc1824-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, if ever I had any doubts about the need for a written constitution, the very short deba...

Lord Kerr of Kinlochard | 767 cc1825-6 (Link to this contribution)

Americans are always very surprised that we get by without a written constitution. That we could ...

Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town | 767 cc1826-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am not absolutely certain that the Labour Party has a position on this. However, as i...

Lord Bridges of Headley | 767 c1827 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I do not think it will surprise noble Lords to hear, at 12.50 pm on a grey Friday, that...

Lord Wallace of Saltaire | 767 c1827 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I would just reflect on how solid is our base and how flexible is our constitution. Fro...

Lord Bridges of Headley | 767 c1827 (Link to this contribution)

I heed what the noble Lord so rightly draws out. My point would be that these are the foundation ...

Lord Purvis of Tweed | 767 cc1827-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I enjoy the interactions with the Minister on this aspect, although we do not see eye t...

Lord Hughes of Woodside | 767 c1828 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have taken part in the debate. As is often the cas...

Back to top