UK Parliament / Open data

Scotland Bill

Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bills on Tuesday, 8 December 2015, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Keen of Elie.
Lords committee stage first day. Clauses 1 and 2 agreed to. Part 1 of 2.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

767 cc1440-1509 

Session

2015-16

Department

Scotland Office

Legislative stage

Committee stage

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Scotland Bill 2015-16. Brought from the Commons.
Tuesday, 10 November 2015
Bills
House of Lords
Scotland Bill. Constitution Committee (HL) sixth report.
Friday, 20 November 2015
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords
Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee fifteenth report.
Wednesday, 2 December 2015
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords
Scotland Bill
Tuesday, 8 December 2015
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords

Proceeding contributions

Lord Norton of Louth | 767 c1441 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Norton of Louth

1: Clause 1, page 1, leave out lines 9 and 10

Lord Norton of Louth | 767 cc1441-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I shall speak also to Amendment 3, which is also in my name. The purpose of the amendme...


Show all contributions (224)
Baroness D'Souza | 767 c1442 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, if this amendment is agreed to, I cannot call Amendment 2 by reason of pre-emption.

...
Lord McCluskey | 767 cc1442-3 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I had not expected to be on my feet just at this moment, but I will speak to Amendments...

Lord Cormack | 767 cc1443-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I will speak briefly to Amendment 7, which stands in my name, but before doing so I agr...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 767 cc1444-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, it is probably right that I should now speak to Amendment 6, as set out on the Marshall...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1446 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I do not often disagree with the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope, but I think he was ...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 767 c1446 (Link to this contribution)

I draw the noble Lord’s attention to the fact that the heads of agreement built on what he said b...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 cc1446-8 (Link to this contribution)

Indeed. Perhaps I have missed out on this modernisation process that is going ahead, but I unders...

Lord Hunt of Chesterton | 767 c1448 (Link to this contribution)

I believe that some of our legislation has now been privatised. Is that not the reason for the no...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1448 (Link to this contribution)

All I can say is that it needs a bit of competition, then. I support my noble friend’s amendments...

Bishop of Chester | 767 cc1448-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, it is always dodgy for bishops to speak about Scottish matters. The kirk has sometimes ...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1449 (Link to this contribution)

If the clause is dishonest in the information which it conveys to the public, how can it be wrong...

Bishop of Chester | 767 c1449 (Link to this contribution)

If the people of Scotland are told, “We toyed with the thought of saying that it was a permanent ...

Lord Maxton | 767 c1449 (Link to this contribution)

The fact is that we have a written constitution; we do not have a codified constitution.

Bishop of Chester | 767 c1449 (Link to this contribution)

I am not sure that I entirely agree with the point, but I will not argue as it would take me down...

Lord Crickhowell | 767 c1449 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I have not spoken previously in this debate but am prompted to do so partly because for...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 767 cc1449-1450 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, as the noble Lord has just indicated, it is very clear that there are implications for ...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1450 (Link to this contribution)

On the subject of political reality, is it not the policy of the noble and learned Lord’s party t...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 767 cc1450-1 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord makes a very good point. But under any federal system there would be a Scottish Pa...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1451 (Link to this contribution)

Is the noble and learned Lord saying that when the clause heading says:

“Permanence of the ...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 767 c1451 (Link to this contribution)

Let me get back to political reality. I do not believe that that would happen. But I think it is ...

Marquess of Lothian | 767 cc1452-3 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I support Amendment 1. We have heard a lot of intricate and technical arguments and I d...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 767 c1453 (Link to this contribution)

I want to put to the noble Marquess a point that I mentioned to the noble Lord, Lord Forsyth. The...

Marquess of Lothian | 767 c1453 (Link to this contribution)

I accept the noble and learned Lord’s suggestion. The word “permanent” is the one that concerns m...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1453 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to my noble friend but I think the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope, was referring...

Marquess of Lothian | 767 c1453 (Link to this contribution)

I do not disagree with my noble friend. What I said was that I do not think that heads of agreeme...

Lord Mackay of Drumadoon | 767 c1454 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, perhaps I may do my best to introduce a little reality to what has happened in this cas...

Lord Maxton | 767 cc1454-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I shall be brief. I spent 17 years in opposition along the corridor, and there are pres...

Lord McCluskey | 767 cc1455-6 (Link to this contribution)

In the light of the debate so far, I should like to add something to what I said before. I remind...

Lord Lang of Monkton | 767 cc1456-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I had not intended to speak on these amendments because I thought that I would prefer t...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 767 c1457 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord has talked much about the sovereignty of the United Kingdom Parliament, as have ot...

Lord Lang of Monkton | 767 cc1457-8 (Link to this contribution)

As I do not know the context and full detail of what my right honourable friend the former Attorn...

Lord Purvis of Tweed | 767 c1458 (Link to this contribution)

Does the noble Lord not agree that there is now considerable case law in Scotland which has looke...

Lord Lang of Monkton | 767 c1458 (Link to this contribution)

That does not surprise me, because I have always taken the view that, ever since we embarked—for ...

Lord Sanderson of Bowden | 767 c1458 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am one of the few non-lawyers who are even putting their foot into this particular ho...

Lord Purvis of Tweed | 767 cc1458-1460 (Link to this contribution)

I do not agree with the mood of the noble Lord, Lord Lang of Monkton, because I do not share his ...

Lord Kerr of Kinlochard | 767 cc1460-1 (Link to this contribution)

These are clearly very deep waters, into which a non-lawyer plunges with some concern. I am very ...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1461 (Link to this contribution)

What about England? I agree it is not the real world but one can imagine circumstances in which t...

Lord Kerr of Kinlochard | 767 c1461 (Link to this contribution)

I do not think the noble Lord has quite understood my proposal. My proposal is that the language ...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 767 c1461 (Link to this contribution)

Does the noble Lord accept that he has very cleverly been answering the conundrum that I put to t...

Lord Kerr of Kinlochard | 767 c1461 (Link to this contribution)

I am very grateful to the noble and learned Lord but I refuse to be drawn into a debate among law...

Lord McAvoy | 767 c1462 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I do not know whether I should have asked for a suit of armour before coming to the Dis...

Marquess of Lothian | 767 c1462 (Link to this contribution)

Can the noble Lord explain how the removal of new subsection (1) would affect the existence of th...

Lord McAvoy | 767 cc1462-3 (Link to this contribution)

To echo the noble Lord, Lord Kerr of Kinlochard, I am not a lawyer and will not get into the deta...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1463 (Link to this contribution)

I will just gently point out to the noble Lord, in relation to his point about the use of languag...

Lord McAvoy | 767 c1463 (Link to this contribution)

The emotional state of the Scottish electorate after the Scottish referendum is still to be analy...

Lord Kerr of Kinlochard | 767 c1463 (Link to this contribution)

We Scots are quite a canny lot. Is the noble Lord quite sure that Scots would not spot that a dec...

Lord McAvoy | 767 c1464 (Link to this contribution)

I appreciate what the noble Lord said and apologise for not dealing with his amendment comprehens...

Lord Kerr of Kinlochard | 767 c1464 (Link to this contribution)

Is there a residential qualification to take part in these debates?

Lord McAvoy | 767 c1464 (Link to this contribution)

No, and I am sorry if the noble Lord took that the wrong way. However, I spend my life in Scotlan...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 cc1464-5 (Link to this contribution)

First, I thank all noble Lords and the right reverend Prelate for their informative submissions, ...

Lord Maxton | 767 c1465 (Link to this contribution)

On that point, all the political parties went into that Smith commission and all of them signed t...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1465 (Link to this contribution)

I am aware of the conduct of the Scottish National Party in that regard and do not make any comme...

Lord Cormack | 767 c1465 (Link to this contribution)

Can my noble and learned friend give any other example of an extra-parliamentary body—the Smith c...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1466 (Link to this contribution)

The proposition is not well founded, with respect. The Smith commission is not binding this Parli...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1466 (Link to this contribution)

I am slightly behind my noble and learned friend’s speech, but I wanted to check the facts. He ha...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1466 (Link to this contribution)

In the course of the Bill’s consideration, steps have been taken to strengthen the political stat...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1466 (Link to this contribution)

Forgive me, but as in the best parliamentary answers, my noble and learned friend is telling me s...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1467 (Link to this contribution)

With respect, I rather thought that I had answered the point made by the noble Lord, but let me r...

Lord Purvis of Tweed | 767 c1467 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to the Minister because I feel that he may well be making my point for me on the su...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1467 (Link to this contribution)

Clearly it is not, because, notwithstanding the outcome of any such referendum, this place might ...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 767 cc1467-8 (Link to this contribution)

I shall take up the point that the Minister made about Clause 1 as a whole—I think he was referri...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1468 (Link to this contribution)

I am obliged to the noble and learned Lord for reminding me of the observations made by the noble...

Lord McAvoy | 767 c1468 (Link to this contribution)

The Minister said a minute ago that the result of any referendum would not be implemented if the ...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1468 (Link to this contribution)

I would be pleased to clarify. We were speaking theoretically in the context of the supremacy and...

Lord McCluskey | 767 c1468 (Link to this contribution)

My noble and learned friend Lord Hope has pointed out the possible difficulty in the current word...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1468 (Link to this contribution)

I am not in a position to say whether he or any other individual falls into that category, and at...

Lord Cormack | 767 c1469 (Link to this contribution)

If my noble and learned friend cannot answer that very simple, straight question, does not that i...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1469 (Link to this contribution)

On the last point, just to be clear, that is what I am saying.

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 767 c1469 (Link to this contribution)

Maybe I can help the Minister. Perhaps he is saying that this is all just declaratory, because af...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1469 (Link to this contribution)

If I can complete the journey around the houses that the noble and learned Lord has begun on that...

Lord Purvis of Tweed | 767 c1469 (Link to this contribution)

Just to carry on a little around the House: the Minister did not make it clear at the Dispatch Bo...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1469 (Link to this contribution)

I cannot agree with the interpretation of sovereignty the noble Lord, Lord Purvis, puts forward. ...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1469 (Link to this contribution)

I may be able to help my noble and learned friend to get off this line of argument. I have been r...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1470 (Link to this contribution)

I do not accept that expression of the position. As I said at the outset, the whole purpose of Cl...

Lord Purvis of Tweed | 767 c1470 (Link to this contribution)

In that case, can the noble and learned Lord expand on the meaning of the Government’s wording in...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1470 (Link to this contribution)

It has a purpose inasmuch as it determines that there cannot be abolition without a referendum. I...

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 767 c1470 (Link to this contribution)

Perhaps I may intervene. The noble and learned Lord—I was going to say “my noble and learned frie...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1470 (Link to this contribution)

I am obliged to my noble and learned friend. It seems to me that we make no further progress on t...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 767 c1471 (Link to this contribution)

Perhaps I may return to new subsection (3), which relates to a separate point from the one that t...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1471 (Link to this contribution)

I notice what the noble and learned Lord says with regard to new subsection (3) in Clause 1.

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 767 c1471 (Link to this contribution)

Section 1(1) of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 also refers to the fact that it is a declaration th...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1471 (Link to this contribution)

With respect, it does not appear to me that the two situations are immediately comparable. In tho...

Lord Cormack | 767 c1471 (Link to this contribution)

I ask my noble and learned friend to respond more positively and helpfully to the noble and learn...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1472 (Link to this contribution)

With respect to my noble friend, I will reflect upon all observations that have been made in this...

Lord Norton of Louth | 767 cc1472-3 (Link to this contribution)

Well, my Lords, this has been a quite fascinating debate. I say to the noble Lord, Lord McAvoy, t...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1473 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean

2: Clause 1, page 1, line 9, after “are” insert “re...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1473 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, we have had quite a good debate already—some two hours or more —on Clause 1, but I woul...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 cc1473-4 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord, Lord McAvoy, says under his breath, “54”. I do not wish to go into the half-life ...

Bishop of Chester | 767 c1474 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, perhaps I may clarify a point. I would not want to introduce a question mark over the c...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1475 (Link to this contribution)

I am most grateful to the right reverend Prelate, but the vow is something that was dreamed up, a...

Lord Lang of Monkton | 767 c1475 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I rise briefly to support my noble friend Lord Forsyth, who is absolutely right. The fa...

Lord Mackay of Clashfern | 767 cc1475-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this is an interesting amendment. I wonder by whom the recognition is supposed to be gi...

Lord Empey | 767 c1476 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, perhaps I may make a brief observation. The noble and learned Lord, Lord Wallace of Tan...

Baroness Liddell of Coatdyke | 767 cc1476-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, we have spent more than two hours arguing more or less about the number of angels danci...

Lord Selkirk of Douglas | 767 c1477 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, Amendment 2, moved by the noble Lord, Lord Forsyth, can be legitimately accepted by Min...

Lord McAvoy | 767 c1477 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the Government in their wisdom accepted the Labour amendment in the other place to refl...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 cc1477-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I begin by making the observation that, without commitment, of course we are listening ...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1478 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, that was an interesting response because, first, my noble and learned friend has underl...

Marquess of Lothian | 767 c1478 (Link to this contribution)

My noble friend is being asked to withdraw the words he is trying to insert because we do not kno...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1478 (Link to this contribution)

My noble friend has stolen my thunder. He is absolutely right. The whole point and discussion we ...

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 767 c1479 (Link to this contribution)

I take the point that issues of politics can intrude into questions of drafting, but if the noble...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1479 (Link to this contribution)

I was not taking exception to anything. I was simply suggesting to the Government that they got i...

Lord Norton of Louth | 767 c1479 (Link to this contribution)

Would my noble friend not wish to call in aid Clause 2 where the Government wish to insert the Se...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1479 (Link to this contribution)

That is the same point, and I am trying to get on to Clause 2. I have to say to my noble and lear...

Lord McCluskey | 767 c1479 (Link to this contribution)

Tabled by

Lord McCluskey

4: Clause 1, page 1, line 11, after first “The” insert “only...

Lord McCluskey | 767 c1479 (Link to this contribution)

In light of the answer relating to the word “only”, to the effect that it is implied by the use o...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 767 c1479 (Link to this contribution)

Tabled by

Lord Hope of Craighead

6: Clause 1, page 1, leave out lines 15 to 17 and in...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 767 c1479 (Link to this contribution)

In the light of what the noble and learned Lord, Lord Keen, said, I understand that he will at le...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1480 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean

8: Clause 1, page 1, line 17, leave out “Scotland” ...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1480 (Link to this contribution)

This amendment again relates to an issue that we touched on in our discussion of earlier amendmen...

Lord Empey | 767 c1480 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Forsyth, makes a good point in so far as referenda in one part of ...

Lord McAvoy | 767 c1481 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, not to anyone’s surprise, we oppose the amendment. It was our amendment in the House of...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1481 (Link to this contribution)

I am obliged to noble Lords. I reiterate that the purpose of the Bill is to implement the recomme...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1481 (Link to this contribution)

I am most grateful, but before my noble and learned friend sits down, could he tell me where in t...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1481 (Link to this contribution)

There is no express reference in the Smith commission agreement to a referendum. As my noble frie...

Lord Thomas of Gresford | 767 c1481 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I believe that this introduces the Welsh element. There would be a profound disinterest...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1482 (Link to this contribution)

I know that the noble Lord has not been following our proceedings so closely, but the point being...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1482 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean

9: Clause 1, page 1, line 17, at end insert—

...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1483 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I hope I will get a bit of a break after this one. Having argued earlier that it was co...

Lord McAvoy | 767 c1483 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, is it not the case that the sovereignty of the UK Parliament is already protected by Se...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1483 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I compliment the noble Lord, Lord Forsyth, on his optimism. The position is clear: we h...

Lord Cormack | 767 c1483 (Link to this contribution)

I will not prolong this brief debate unduly, but my noble and learned friend seems to be adopting...

Lord Mackay of Clashfern | 767 c1483 (Link to this contribution)

That may well be so, but there is already a declaratory statement in the Act which the Bill amend...

Lord Tebbit | 767 c1484 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I have tried to follow this. It is not unduly easy but it would help me greatly if my n...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1484 (Link to this contribution)

Perhaps I can help my noble and learned friend. Throughout this afternoon, he has argued that it ...

Lord Mackay of Clashfern | 767 c1484 (Link to this contribution)

It has to be remembered that this Bill is amending the Scotland Act. This provision, which my nob...

Lord McCluskey | 767 c1484 (Link to this contribution)

The actual wording of Section 28(7), which I do not suppose many noble Lords will have memorised,...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 cc1484-5 (Link to this contribution)

I shall give way to my noble and learned friend in a moment. I wish to deal with the points that ...

Bishop of Chester | 767 c1485 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I think that nothing in this Bill qualifies the ultimate sovereignty of the UK Parliame...

Marquess of Lothian | 767 c1485 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I put a question to my noble friend Lord Forsyth. Having listened to this argument, doe...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1485 (Link to this contribution)

My noble friend puts it so succinctly. I wish that I had the ability to put it as concisely as he...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1485 (Link to this contribution)

I apologise to my noble friend Lord Forsyth. I must confess that I was unclear who was intervenin...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 767 c1486 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to the noble and learned Lord for giving way, but Clause 2 amends Section 28. We ar...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1486 (Link to this contribution)

I accept that correction from the noble and learned Lord. I believe that Section 63 would be amen...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1486 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I think this may be a good moment for me to withdraw my amendment. However, before doin...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1486 (Link to this contribution)

The Marquess of Lothian. I am sorry. My noble friend has had so many names that I find it difficu...

Lord McAvoy | 767 c1486 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord is trying to paint a picture of government intransigence. As the Government’s Offi...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1487 (Link to this contribution)

For a moment, when the noble Lord referred to the Official Opposition and the unofficial oppositi...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1487 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean

10: Clause 2, page 2, line 2, leave out “The Sewel ...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1487 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, surely the Government can accept this amendment. The Sewel convention, as its name sugg...

Lord Norton of Louth | 767 c1487 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I signed this amendment, and support it. I want to reinforce what my noble friend Lord ...

Lord Stephen | 767 cc1487-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, it is worth giving support to this amendment and pointing out that the original Sewel c...

Lord Steel of Aikwood | 767 c1488 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I back up what my noble friend has said. I was in the House when we passed the Scotland...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1488 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, first, there is the question of whether the heading is a matter for the parliamentary d...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1488 (Link to this contribution)

I did take advice on this. The amendment has been tabled so the amendment is in order, surely.

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1488 (Link to this contribution)

I was going to continue by saying that, the amendment having been tabled, I would look to its sub...

Lord Purvis of Tweed | 767 c1488 (Link to this contribution)

I am neither a lawyer nor a historian so I wonder if the noble and learned Lord can help me with ...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1488 (Link to this contribution)

As I understand it, the title will not exist in the amended 1998 Act. The title is a matter for t...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1489 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am very happy to withdraw it. I am grateful to my noble and learned friend for reliev...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1489 (Link to this contribution)

The term “the Sewel convention” will remain in this Act but will not appear in the amended Scotla...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1489 (Link to this contribution)

Right, well, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment but give notice that we will return to this at...

Lord Stephen | 767 c1489 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Stephen

11: Clause 2, page 2, line 3, after “Parliament)” insert “in su...

Lord Stephen | 767 cc1489-1490 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, in moving Amendment 11, I will speak also to Amendments 15 and 16, which are in my name...

Lord Gordon of Strathblane | 767 c1490 (Link to this contribution)

In the light of what the noble Lord has said, would it not be logical that legislative consent fr...

Lord Stephen | 767 cc1490-1 (Link to this contribution)

I agree that there is an issue there. I wonder whether the discussions that will take place in co...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 767 c1491 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, perhaps it would be helpful for me to speak to my Amendment 12, which in effect restate...

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 767 c1491 (Link to this contribution)

Could the noble and learned Lord indicate what the Scottish Government see as particularly virtuo...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 767 c1492 (Link to this contribution)

I am obliged to the noble and learned Lord. There are really two points. First, Clause 2 as worde...

Lord Lang of Monkton | 767 cc1492-3 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope of Craighead, for his comments about the w...

Lord Cormack | 767 cc1493-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I will speak briefly to the two amendments in my name, Amendments 14 and 18. I thank th...

Lord Norton of Louth | 767 cc1494-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, these amendments, on the whole, move us forward. They are an improvement on what is pre...

Lord McCluskey | 767 c1495 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I was happy to add my name to Amendment 14 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Cormack....

Lord Foulkes of Cumnock | 767 c1495 (Link to this contribution)

Could the noble and learned Lord tell me what “normally” normally means?

Lord McCluskey | 767 c1495 (Link to this contribution)

That depends on the context in which it is used. Normally, “normally” means “usually”—but “norm” ...

Duke of Montrose | 767 cc1495-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I support my noble friend Lord Lang in what he said. The wording of this clause reflect...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 cc1496-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I will speak briefly to support my noble friend Lord Norton’s remarks and the amendment...

Lord Maxton | 767 c1497 (Link to this contribution)

I am trying to follow the noble Lord’s arguments carefully but it seems that, even with the new p...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 cc1497-8 (Link to this contribution)

Well, devolution was not my idea but that seems to be what it means. You cannot have it both ways...

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 767 cc1498-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, there has been a widespread and interesting debate on this very important area of legis...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1499 (Link to this contribution)

Has the noble and learned Lord not seen the statements made by senior Ministers in the Scottish G...

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 767 c1499 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord will of course be aware that I have seen those statements and have been interested...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 767 cc1499-1500 (Link to this contribution)

I hoped that the noble and learned Lord might say something about Amendment 20. Perhaps I was not...

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 767 c1500 (Link to this contribution)

I apologise for not confirming that we support Amendment 20. I took that as being the overall app...

Lord Mackay of Clashfern | 767 c1500 (Link to this contribution)

What is the noble and learned Lord’s view about the provisions in Amendment 12, which was tabled ...

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 767 c1500 (Link to this contribution)

Perhaps I can try to explain the proposition put forward by the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1500 (Link to this contribution)

I am obliged for the contributions that have been made with regard to Clause 2 and the proposed a...

Lord Stephen | 767 c1500 (Link to this contribution)

Does the Minister accept that the House of Commons could pass something and the House of Lords co...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1500 (Link to this contribution)

I am not quite sure about the use of the term “veto”.

Lord Stephen | 767 c1500 (Link to this contribution)

Would the Minister prefer “block” or “prevent being enacted”?

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1501 (Link to this contribution)

It merely means that in respect of matters that are English measures, there must be an element of...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1501 (Link to this contribution)

While it is true that legislation still requires the consent of both Houses, EVEL gives a group o...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1501 (Link to this contribution)

The term “veto”, if you wish to employ it, is there. It means that English measures require the c...

Duke of Montrose | 767 c1501 (Link to this contribution)

When the Minister talks about the Sewel convention as it has been for 15 years, that does not inc...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 cc1501-2 (Link to this contribution)

I am obliged to his Grace. That does not, and that is why the convention is expressed as it is in...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1502 (Link to this contribution)

I am most grateful to my noble and learned friend. Does that mean that as the number of passes be...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1502 (Link to this contribution)

The point is that in terms of Section 28(7) we in this Parliament could, on the face of it, inter...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 767 cc1502-3 (Link to this contribution)

The problem is that paragraph 22 of the Smith commission report states that the Sewel convention ...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1503 (Link to this contribution)

The noble and learned Lord acknowledges that there would be no remedy other than a political reme...

Lord McCluskey | 767 c1503 (Link to this contribution)

On that point, this provision can be put in to render the matter not justiciable, but that is in ...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1503 (Link to this contribution)

In that context, it would be declaring that this is a clause that gives rise to only a political ...

Lord Cormack | 767 c1504 (Link to this contribution)

If the Minister is prepared to have those discussions, which are welcome, would he also be prepar...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1504 (Link to this contribution)

I would respond to my noble friend by saying that anything is possible.

Lord Scott of Foscote | 767 c1504 (Link to this contribution)

The debate at the moment seems to be concerned exclusively with primary legislation. Clause 2 is ...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1504 (Link to this contribution)

If I may, I shall respond to the observations from the noble and learned Lord, Lord Scott, after ...

Lord Lawson of Blaby | 767 c1504 (Link to this contribution)

If the Minister will allow me, those of us who are not as expert as he is are getting a little pu...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1504 (Link to this contribution)

In a sense, this is connected to my earlier observation that at the end of the day the clause is ...

Lord McCluskey | 767 c1504 (Link to this contribution)

Does the Minister realise that if the UK Government decide that the situation is abnormal and the...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1504 (Link to this contribution)

With respect to the noble and learned Lord, Lord McCluskey, I do not accept that proposition. It ...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1505 (Link to this contribution)

I will not accept an intervention this stage.

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1505 (Link to this contribution)

I am obliged to the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes.

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 cc1505-6 (Link to this contribution)

In view of the time, no.

Amendment 11 would clearly impact on the ability of the United Kin...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 767 c1506 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, before my noble friend withdraws his amendment, can I ask my noble and learned friend a...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1506 (Link to this contribution)

I do not accept the proposition that my noble friend Lord Forsyth advances. The position is that ...

Lord Norton of Louth | 767 cc1506-7 (Link to this contribution)

My noble and learned friend’s argument was that the Bill puts into statute the recommendations of...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1507 (Link to this contribution)

I do not accept that, because it appears that what is understood by the Sewel convention is the e...

Duke of Montrose | 767 c1507 (Link to this contribution)

Can the Minister say whether that means that there will be a new convention that includes those e...

Lord Keen of Elie | 767 c1507 (Link to this contribution)

It may be that further working arrangements will develop as between the two Parliaments with resp...

Lord Stephen | 767 c1507 (Link to this contribution)

As noble Lords will know, the Liberal Democrats are very supportive of the Bill, but the explanat...

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 767 c1508 (Link to this contribution)

I have a feeling that the Committee is going down the wrong line here. The Minister has made it e...

Lord Stephen | 767 c1508 (Link to this contribution)

I will readily grab that escape route, and I thank the noble and learned Lord for that assistance...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 767 cc1508-9 (Link to this contribution)

Tabled by

Lord Hope of Craighead

12: Clause 2, page 2, leave out lines 5 to 7 and ins...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 767 c1509 (Link to this contribution)

I am bound to say that I am very troubled by this whole matter and we will have to return to it o...

Lord Scott of Foscote | 767 c1509 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I wanted to say a word about Amendment 12.

Earl of Courtown | 767 c1509 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, we had the opportunity to speak to this amendment in a previous grouping.

Lord Cormack | 767 c1509 (Link to this contribution)

Tabled by

Lord Cormack

14: Clause 2, page 2, line 6, leave out “normally”

Lord Cormack | 767 c1509 (Link to this contribution)

I give notice that I will return to this on Report.

Legislation

Scotland Bill 2015-16
Back to top