There could be an interesting distinction between practical completion and the issue of a completion certificate under the terms of the contract. Both parties might agree that the work has been finished, but it is probably in the contract that 5%, or whatever it might be will be retained for a period of time, which should be defined in the contract, in order to deal with snagging. I think the noble Lord’s position is that the contract is not written in sufficient detail to cover exactly what it is the parties have agreed.
Enterprise Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Viscount Eccles
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 28 October 2015.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Enterprise Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
765 c214GC Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-06-15 18:20:27 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-10-28/15102850000036
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-10-28/15102850000036
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-10-28/15102850000036