My Lords, I stand again to support this wonderful amendment with its mover. What is going on here? This makes sense to me. There are detention centre rules which govern immigration removal centres, but the short-term holding facilities in airports, as has already been mentioned, are very different. In some of them—for example, Pennine House in Manchester where, sadly, a Pakistani man died last July—people can be held for up to seven days. There need to be published rules to provide a sound governance structure. Without that, we will not be reassured. People can be held at times of great personal and familial stress. The intention behind the amendment is to make sure that these facilities make good provision, with clear rules, for safety, care, health, activities, discipline and control of detained persons. Who would argue against that?
Immigration Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Archbishop of York
(Bishops (affiliation))
in the House of Lords on Monday, 3 March 2014.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Immigration Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
752 c1138 Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2014-03-14 12:47:37 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-03-03/1403038000107
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-03-03/1403038000107
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-03-03/1403038000107