I still have not understood the Minister’s logic. I appreciate and want to commend the removal of the two-stage approach—the fast-forward immigration decision and then the removal decision. That has caused difficulty to a lot of people whom I have been representing and the Secretary of State knows that because we have had wonderful conversations. Therefore, I applaud that. But if there are 72 hours in which you can appeal the decision, what is the problem of giving notice in writing of the date and approximate time of the removal? People could still appeal within 72 hours. Why not state that? I cannot understand the logic. Can the Minister please help me?
Immigration Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Archbishop of York
(Bishops (affiliation))
in the House of Lords on Monday, 3 March 2014.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Immigration Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
752 c1122 Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2014-03-14 12:47:37 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-03-03/1403034000155
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-03-03/1403034000155
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-03-03/1403034000155