Is that the question of hybridity? I do not think I am qualified to speak on hybridity, which I seem to remember is the question of whether a Public Bill affects the rights of a subset of people differently from the general class of people. I do not think my amendment does that because I have spoken just in terms of general classes: hereditary peerage, baronetcy and officers of the Crown and state. Those are generic classes, with no special definitions, unlike the House of Lords Bill, which discriminated in favour of only English hereditary great offices of state and not Scottish ones.
Equality (Titles) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Earl of Erroll
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Friday, 6 December 2013.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Equality (Titles) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
750 c551 Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2015-03-17 10:55:20 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-12-06/13120659000289
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-12-06/13120659000289
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-12-06/13120659000289