My Lords, I am reluctant to intervene on the Minister when he is reading a very carefully constructed argument but, with all due respect, what he has just read defies logic. Bearing in mind that the person must have been diagnosed with mesothelioma after July 2012 and, if the draft rules become the rules of the scheme, must have brought any claim within three years of that diagnosis. It is envisaged that in that period the person would have sued somebody despite the fact that they were unable to find the relevant employer or the relevant insurer. It cannot possibly have been the relevant employer or the relevant insurer that they sued so the determination of the case is an irrelevance. I do not understand how people can sue somebody they cannot find.
Mesothelioma Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Browne of Ladyton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 5 June 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Mesothelioma Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
745 c257GC Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2015-03-26 19:28:28 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-05/13060599000070
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-05/13060599000070
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-05/13060599000070