My Lords, I certainly was not objecting to the meetings that were held with the insurance industry in the lead-up to the Bill. I mentioned that at Second Reading the Minister told us how many meetings there had been not just with the victims support group but with various other stakeholders, such as the lawyers representing the victims. I had hoped that those consultations would have been extended into the period when the details of the scheme are being formulated. We would hope that there would be equality of arms between the insurance industry and the representatives of the victims in designing the details of the scheme and in looking at any amendments that may be necessary later on. However, we have to be content with what the Minister has said this afternoon and hope that, at least by Report, we will be looking at something a little more concrete than the Minister was able to say to us. In the meanwhile, I withdraw the amendment.
Mesothelioma Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Avebury
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 5 June 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Mesothelioma Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
745 c210GC Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2015-03-26 19:28:25 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-05/13060573000034
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-05/13060573000034
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-05/13060573000034