On a different but not unrelated point, the Minister will recall that I referred to the annual report given to the Secretary of State detailing the individual bulk personal datasets that had been retained and examined. There is no extra work involved in letting the ISC and IPCO see that report. The only possible justifiable exclusion would be something that, at the time of the report, was still current. Is there any reason at all why IPCO and the ISC should not be sent that report, rather than a severely watered-down version?
Investigatory Powers (Amendment) Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Julian Lewis
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 19 February 2024.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Investigatory Powers (Amendment) Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
745 c558 Session
2023-24Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-03-13 16:53:56 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-02-19/2402201000020
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-02-19/2402201000020
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-02-19/2402201000020