Amendment 45, as the hon. Lady has just said, would permanently designate Rwanda an unsafe country. She has just complained about decision makers having to designate it the other way. Therefore, first, what is the difference? Secondly, is that not offensive to Rwanda? Thirdly, is that not worrying to the 100-plus refugees from Libya whom the UN recently settled in Rwanda? Under what circumstances would she then agree to legislation that recognised Rwanda again as a safe country?
Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Tim Loughton
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 16 January 2024.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
743 c710Session
2023-24Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-17 11:21:12 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-01-16/24011627000343
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-01-16/24011627000343
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-01-16/24011627000343