The hon. Member touches on an important point. I am not prepared to have my aspiration determined and defined by the aspirations of others. If the key demand of nationalists is that the Bill do what it does for the Irish language, that is their right, but at no stage during the NDNA negotiations did we ever suggest that our aspiration for this legislation was limited to language. We made it absolutely clear that it was not limited to Ulster Scots; it was about protecting our Ulster British heritage, culture and identity. Why does the hon. Member feel that his Unionist constituents in North Down should have their aspiration limited to conform to the aspirations of others who have limited their demand to language? We never did so. We were clear about what we sought to achieve. I therefore think that the hon. Member does not understand, and does not seek to understand, where we are coming from.
Identity and Language (Northern Ireland) Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Jeffrey M Donaldson
(Democratic Unionist Party)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 26 October 2022.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Identity and Language (Northern Ireland) Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
721 c342 Session
2022-23Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-10-28 10:28:24 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-10-26/22102667000061
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-10-26/22102667000061
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-10-26/22102667000061