I see that my hon. Friend is about to finish, and I have just got in in time. I understand his desire for both breadth and depth, and he has very clearly identified various actors that would fall within the definition that he desires. However, there are big financial institutions that will at times be guns for hire for countries or institutions abroad, and for such a period their work may be contrary to what this country might like. I think that would be too broad, so what would his interpretation of that be? I am thinking of the big financial institution that perhaps assisted Greece into the euro at the time. It was perhaps a policy that was not great for the UK, but we would not say that it was normally a hostile institution.
National Security Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Mackinlay of Richborough
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 6 June 2022.
It occurred during Debate on bills on National Security Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
715 c621 Session
2022-23Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-06-08 09:26:46 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-06-06/22060640000029
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-06-06/22060640000029
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-06-06/22060640000029