I am grateful to my right hon. and learned Friend. I always bow to him in the knowledge of the law, as of course I would. I thought he was an excellent Justice Secretary—I will just slip that one in, gratis, and I am sure he can dine out on it. I agree with him wholeheartedly, because what he says is right. I will come back to the flexibility that is required, but I come to the principle of what we are saying. We are seeking to strike out that little lacuna that results from the words “knowingly or recklessly”. That would make this about the responsibility of the person concerned and that would be it—there would be no let-outs, no issues and no quibbling. This is the key. Everything in the other amendments is relevant to it; they merely backfill various areas, and it is important that they should refer to clause 31. They make it clear that responsibility rests with the individual—the entity, should I say—in this particular case.
Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Iain Duncan Smith
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 7 March 2022.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
710 c104 Session
2021-22Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-03-08 14:53:44 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-03-07/22030756000195
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-03-07/22030756000195
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-03-07/22030756000195