I come back to the point about the impact assessment. The document prepared for the House says that a full impact assessment has been prepared. Ministers need to give accurate information to the House, so if that is not correct and is misleading, it should be corrected immediately. It is not good enough to say that something will come along afterwards; we are being asked to vote on these regulations today. There is no urgency—the regulations do not come into force for 16 weeks, until November—so it is perfectly reasonable for them to be taken away and for the impact assessment that has been prepared to be published. If there is uncertainty, share the uncertainty with the House. It is not good enough to expect us to vote on something that is difficult, controversial and complicated and not share with the House the information that the Minister has at her disposal. It is an abuse. It is not good enough.
National Health Service
Proceeding contribution from
Mark Harper
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 13 July 2021.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on National Health Service.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
699 c272 Session
2021-22Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-03-01 17:18:11 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2021-07-13/21071367000004
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2021-07-13/21071367000004
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2021-07-13/21071367000004