Some of the concern is that this is actually not that straightforward. The terms of reference that set up the Hart inquiry clearly said that what came after the findings was not a matter for the chair of the inquiry. There are issues and decision points in those recommendations. To use a quick example, Hart recommends legal aid or separate legal representation for each of the people coming forward to a redress board. That has never been agreed. There would be a huge cost and, in my view, a lot of bureaucracy with that approach. There are decision points in the recommendations that, as I understand it in terms of the guidance, could not be made by a civil servant, because there is no consensus at this stage on those matters. That is the complication, and that is why the Secretary of State needs to step in and make those decisions.
Northern Ireland (Executive Formation and Exercise of Functions) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Emma Little Pengelly
(Democratic Unionist Party)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 24 October 2018.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Northern Ireland (Executive Formation and Exercise of Functions) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
648 c376 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-01-07 11:49:28 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-10-24/18102476000051
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-10-24/18102476000051
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-10-24/18102476000051