UK Parliament / Open data

Nuclear Safeguards Bill

Proceeding contribution from Ben Bradley (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 23 January 2018. It occurred during Debate on bills on Nuclear Safeguards Bill.

I do not know the hon. Gentleman’s background, but I guess it probably is not business.

We cannot fix the plan for withdrawal and implementation in stone now. The Labour party wants to build into the Bill a clause saying that the Bill is contingency only. Our relationship with Euratom is subject to negotiation. No one has written anything off. We want a positive relationship, but we might have to develop and rely on our own framework, and the work to put it in place needs to happen now. An amendment to say that the Bill is merely a contingency would achieve the opposite of its intention by reducing impetus and leading to delays in the process of getting our safeguards in place, which is only bad for the industry and for all the things the hon. Member for Southampton, Test (Dr Whitehead) tried to raise.

That is why I oppose new clause 1, and I hope to speak later about my support for the Bill more broadly.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

635 c186 

Session

2017-19

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top