The hon. Gentleman knows that this is incredibly important to him and several of his colleagues, and it is incredibly important to me, with EDF Energy’s operational headquarters for nuclear in my constituency and Horizon just down the road, so we are all coming from the same point. His specific proposal—I am talking about new clause 1 again—is very specific. It even mentions a period of two years, although the transition period that is being negotiated may well come to an end at the end of 2020. In effect, he is asking the Government to legislate on something over which they do not have control. Surely the better approach is to plan for the contingency, as he has already agreed, and recognise that the other elements—Euratom and other agencies—are all subject to a negotiation that this House cannot, by its nature, control.
Nuclear Safeguards Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Richard Graham
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 23 January 2018.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Nuclear Safeguards Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
635 c166 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2018-02-07 16:53:54 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-01-23/18012332000035
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-01-23/18012332000035
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-01-23/18012332000035