UK Parliament / Open data

Finance Bill

Proceeding contribution from Kirsty Blackman (Scottish National Party) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 31 October 2017. It occurred during Debate on bills on Finance Bill.

I am delighted to be in the Chamber to talk about the second of the three Finance Bills we will have this year. When the Chancellor stood up and said we would move to having fewer fiscal events a year, I am not sure that this is what he had in mind. I am particularly excited about the third one, which will be coming along soon, and I really hope that it takes account of Brexit because the Government’s Finance Bills have so far failed to do so. I hope we will have a Budget that takes account of the economic shock that will happen as a result of Brexit, puts in place the infrastructure spend that we particularly need, and makes it clear that we should stay in the single market.

On our specific concerns about this Finance Bill— I saw you getting a bit edgy, Mr Deputy Speaker, but I will get on to it—I agree with Labour Front Benchers that there have been a number of missed opportunities, and we still have concerns. We have previously mentioned these concerns, but they bear repeating because this place is good like that.

The first issue is VAT on police and fire services. This Finance Bill should have taken the opportunity to remove the VAT paid by Scottish police and fire services. We have made this case time and again and we will continue to do so. I hope that the Chancellor will listen and make changes in the Budget. We would like the VAT that police and fire services have paid to be paid back, and we would like the VAT bill to be got rid of in

the future. There is a precedent for doing so—other organisations do not have a VAT bill—and we will carry on making this case very strongly.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

630 cc782-3 

Session

2017-19

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber

Legislation

Finance Bill 2017-19
Back to top