I do not accept that the Government have gone as far as some of us would have liked them to go on the double lock, which is by having full-blown judicial warrantry with the power to look at the merits as well as at the process. However, I accept that this is an improvement on what was originally in the Bill, and its inclusion is a great tribute to the hard work that was done by me and my hon. Friend the Member for Paisley and Renfrewshire North (Gavin Newlands), as well as by Labour members of the Committee. If there had not been such root-and-branch opposition, many of the Government amendments that have finally been passed in the Lords would not be with us today.
Investigatory Powers Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Joanna Cherry
(Scottish National Party)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 1 November 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Investigatory Powers Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
616 c852 Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-08-07 09:47:14 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-11-01/16110164000661
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-11-01/16110164000661
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-11-01/16110164000661