Those are two very valid points. I have seen flicker for myself. Although I stood in the flicker of a wind turbine for only 10 minutes on one occasion, I understand how intrusive it could be if it affected someone’s house or their place of work. I know from my constituency—I am sure that other hon. and right hon. Members will have had similar experiences—that when those turbines are moved through small villages, sometimes they cannot get through without some sort of remedy having to be made to the road. A number of people visited me this morning from the lovely village of Guilsborough, where, if a turbine shaft were to be driven through the village to a nearby wind farm, there would be a gap of inches between the turbine shaft and the houses on each side of the road. Those things do cause concern. I would say that flicker causes more concern than traffic movement, and amplitude modulation probably more than flicker.
Energy Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Chris Heaton-Harris
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 14 March 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) on Energy Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
607 c671 Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-03-23 16:08:06 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-03-14/16031410000113
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-03-14/16031410000113
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-03-14/16031410000113