I have to register my deep disappointment in Her Majesty’s official Opposition; I had expected better of them this afternoon. This is a very important debate for the people of Northern Ireland, who have had to live with paramilitary activity for so long. We would have it called terrorism, but we now define it as paramilitary activity. There is no difference between those people, however; they are terrorists by another name. I am deeply disappointed, and I would like the hon. Gentleman to explain the rationale for this decision by Her Majesty’s Opposition. He gave the House some good reasons earlier, and there is consensus on these Benches, so will he tell us what legitimate justification he has for sitting on his hands? Forgive me for putting it like that, but that is effectively what he and his colleagues are going to do this afternoon, and it is quite disgraceful.
Northern Ireland (Stormont Agreement and Implementation Plan) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lady Hermon
(Independent (affiliation))
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 10 March 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Northern Ireland (Stormont Agreement and Implementation Plan) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
607 c503 Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2016-03-15 13:09:00 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-03-10/16031040000759
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-03-10/16031040000759
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-03-10/16031040000759