That is what the Government say the target is. As the hon. Gentleman knows, I respect him greatly for his independence of mind and thought, and for his intellect on these matters. As I said at the outset, if abuses are going on in relation to public sector exit payments, we are perfectly willing to say they should be stopped, but we need to look at what the clause actually does. It picks the figure of £95,000 to generate a headline saying that the Bill will stop fat-cat public sector exit payments of more than £100,000. However, what it does not elucidate very well is that that £95,000 is not just a cash lump sum, but includes the so-called strain payments that are paid into workers’ pension funds when they are forced into redundancy before retirement age. That is money they will never get in their pockets—they are not walking away with £95,000. They are not fat cats earning more than £100,000, and some are on relatively modest incomes. The Bill will also capture many people in the private sector, which the Government were also not keen to elucidate on.
Enterprise Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Kevin Brennan
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 8 March 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Enterprise Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
607 c171 Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2016-03-11 11:46:46 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-03-08/16030861000903
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-03-08/16030861000903
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-03-08/16030861000903