I thank the hon. Gentleman for that point of order. I remind the House that we are discussing the consent motion, rather than the rights and wrongs of EVEL. I have allowed the debate—it has been a rather two-way exchange—to go on a little because we are right at the beginning of the EVEL process; this is certainly my first time in the Chair during a Legislative Grand Committee, and it is only the third time that this has happened. However, as the hon. Gentleman said, the Procedure Committee is looking at the EVEL process in the round. The hon. Member for North Down (Lady Hermon) should really make a submission to that Committee. It would be good if we could now move on to discuss the consent motion or put the question.
Charities (Protection and Social Investment) Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Natascha Engel
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 26 January 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) on Charities (Protection and Social Investment) Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
605 c230 Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2016-04-01 11:04:50 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-26/16012631001218
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-26/16012631001218
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-26/16012631001218