I can reassure the hon. Member for North Down (Lady Hermon) that the Procedure Committee, of which I am a member, is looking at what is happening with this procedure and will report back to the House. It shall be noted that these are matters of great interest, but recently when I have sat in on consent motions for these sorts of debates under English votes for English laws, I have noted that nothing is said at all. It is incumbent on us to draw up procedures that actually make a difference and have a purpose. The problem with EVEL is that, because the Conservative Government have an overall majority, no Bill will be changed one iota in this Parliament as a result of EVEL. Because all the other parties are opposed to EVEL, if the Conservative party does not have a majority after the next general election, the procedure could be abolished in an afternoon. The Committee will be looking at these procedures very carefully and—of course, I cannot speak for its other members—will want to be reassured that the procedures under EVEL are actually changing something.
Charities (Protection and Social Investment) Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Edward Leigh
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 26 January 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) on Charities (Protection and Social Investment) Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
605 c228 Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2016-04-01 11:04:50 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-26/16012631001209
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-26/16012631001209
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-26/16012631001209