On a point of order, Ms Engel. I make this point of order with a heavy heart, but I feel duty-bound to do so. When the certification process was introduced and debated before the Christmas recess, the indication was that when the Mace was moved and we sat in the Legislative Grand Committee, a Minister would be called upon to move the consent motion and then a debate would commence. It was disappointing last night that there was no effort by the Minister to open a debate about why the consent motion was being moved. As I find this happening again today, I seek clarification from the Chair as to whether it is appropriate now to consistently adopt a routine of a Minister moving a motion without further debate.
Charities (Protection and Social Investment) Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Lady Hermon
(Independent (affiliation))
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 26 January 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) on Charities (Protection and Social Investment) Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
605 c227 Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2016-04-01 11:04:49 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-26/16012631001203
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-26/16012631001203
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-26/16012631001203