It is important that the Minister reflects that that was a manifesto commitment—even some of us on the Government Benches had concerns about it, but it was a manifesto commitment. It was rightly brought up in the Housing and Planning Bill, and it is disrespectful to the House, and a dangerous precedent, when one Bill is used to undermine another Bill that is part and parcel of a manifesto commitment. That also happened in the previous Parliament on the boundary changes, when a measure in an entirely different bit of legislation was used to oppose that policy. The House of Lords is abusing its position if it thinks it can do that in that form.
Charities (Protection and Social Investment) Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Mark Field
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 26 January 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) on Charities (Protection and Social Investment) Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
605 c212 Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2016-04-01 11:04:49 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-26/16012631000139
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-26/16012631000139
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-26/16012631000139