I hesitate to be repetitive, but the truth is that these charities are different. Let me give a practical example. Say, for instance, that an NHS charitable trust that has become independent and that has independent trustees runs a huge appeal to raise money for a CAT scanner to go into a hospital. It gets three quarters of the way through the appeal and, suddenly, it becomes apparent that the money has gone missing. There are people queued up, waiting to use the CAT scanner. The charity may get lost in months and months of inquiry, and much of the money, which was for a dedicated purpose, may be defrayed on other things to deal with the problems—accountants, lawyers, judges, challenges from elsewhere or whatever else. We have seen that sort of thing happen before. I would want the Secretary of State to be able to step in and say, “No. We are now going to appoint trustees who will make sure the money is spent on the CAT scanner, and that people get the treatment they need.”
NHS (Charitable Trusts Etc) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Kit Malthouse
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Friday, 22 January 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on NHS (Charitable Trusts Etc) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
604 c1693 Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-11-04 13:30:04 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-22/16012222000258
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-22/16012222000258
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-22/16012222000258