UK Parliament / Open data

Access to Medical Treatments (Innovation) Bill

As I understand it, the current test requires a doctor to seek the advice and medical opinion of a responsible body, while the arrangements in the Bill require them to seek someone else’s view on whether such a responsible body holds an opinion about the safety of treatment. I think those two things are slightly different. Does the Minister share that concern?

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

600 c609 

Session

2015-16

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top