As I understand it, the current test requires a doctor to seek the advice and medical opinion of a responsible body, while the arrangements in the Bill require them to seek someone else’s view on whether such a responsible body holds an opinion about the safety of treatment. I think those two things are slightly different. Does the Minister share that concern?
Access to Medical Treatments (Innovation) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Heidi Alexander
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Friday, 16 October 2015.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Access to Medical Treatments (Innovation) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
600 c609 Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-11-04 13:31:34 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-10-16/15101634000424
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-10-16/15101634000424
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-10-16/15101634000424