As I said, a decision was made by the Scottish Government, believing that the efficiency savings were more than sufficient to outweigh the costs incurred by losing the section 33 refund. That was the basis for the decision, and the position in respect of section 33 was clear.
Scotland Bill
Proceeding contribution from
David Gauke
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 29 June 2015.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Scotland Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
597 c1261Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2015-07-01 10:11:06 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-06-29/15062922000013
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-06-29/15062922000013
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-06-29/15062922000013