There are two issues in relation to that. First, people often say, “That’s what Denmark has; it is able to negotiate directly because it has a complete opt-out on these matters.” However, Denmark does not have any other legal avenue for opting in to those measures. As the Commission has made clear, given that there is another legal avenue for the United Kingdom—as negotiated by the previous Government—that is what should be pursued, rather than a separate extradition treaty with the EU. Secondly, I say to right hon. and hon. Members who think that some form of bilateral treaties would be a way of getting around the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice, that Denmark has been required to submit to the jurisdiction of the ECJ as part of the conditions of agreeing a treaty with the European Union.
The UK’s Justice and Home Affairs Opt-outs
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness May of Maidenhead
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 10 July 2014.
It occurred during Debate on The UK’s Justice and Home Affairs Opt-outs.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
584 c487 Session
2014-15Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-08-30 18:20:42 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-07-10/14071054000524
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-07-10/14071054000524
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-07-10/14071054000524