UK Parliament / Open data

Pensions Bill

Proceeding contribution from Gregg McClymont (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 17 March 2014. It occurred during Debate on bills on Pensions Bill.

I rise to speak to amendment (a), but let me start with Lords amendment 4. In Committee, the Opposition argued strongly that clause 37, as drafted, was far too widely drawn and left a possibility that those with an agenda to exempt smaller businesses from auto-enrolment could do so. We therefore welcome the Government’s concession. Among the Minister’s rather curious language, he said that I “got very excited” and that there was “almost universal cynicism” from the Opposition, but within that odd framing, he has actually accepted what we said in Committee. That is very welcome, because it makes the Bill better.

Let us think about amendment (a) in the context of the wider debate. The issue of costs and charges for pensions has shot up the political agenda for obvious reasons. If the Government are enrolling millions of people into a pension scheme for the first time, they had better make sure that the schemes are all value for money.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

577 c588 

Session

2013-14

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber

Subjects

Legislation

Pensions Bill 2013-14
Back to top