The Opposition’s view is clear: the issue of job insecurity, of short-hours working and of zero-hours contracts is a significant problem for the pensions market and, specifically, for the state pension. In that context, it seems wise to us to allow the Minister to crack on with solving this problem. I have confidence that he will ensure that this amendment, if agreed to by the House, provides the basis for matching up the state pension with people on these insecure and flexible employment contracts. On that basis, we disagree with the Minister’s disagreement, and we intend to support the Lords amendment.
Pensions Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Gregg McClymont
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 17 March 2014.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Pensions Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
577 c570 Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2014-03-20 15:19:23 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-03-17/14031711000279
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-03-17/14031711000279
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-03-17/14031711000279