UK Parliament / Open data

Pensions Bill

Proceeding contribution from Gregg McClymont (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 17 March 2014. It occurred during Debate on bills on Pensions Bill.

The Opposition’s view is clear: the issue of job insecurity, of short-hours working and of zero-hours contracts is a significant problem for the pensions market and, specifically, for the state pension. In that context, it seems wise to us to allow the Minister to crack on with solving this problem. I have confidence that he will ensure that this amendment, if agreed to by the House, provides the basis for matching up the state pension with people on these insecure and flexible employment contracts. On that basis, we disagree with the Minister’s disagreement, and we intend to support the Lords amendment.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

577 c570 

Session

2013-14

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber

Subjects

Legislation

Pensions Bill 2013-14
Back to top