UK Parliament / Open data

Defence Reform Bill

Proceeding contribution from Jim Murphy (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 16 July 2013. It occurred during Debate on bills on Defence Reform Bill.

You know me well, Mr Deputy Speaker. Since we were serious, we have always said—[Hon. Members: “Ooh!”] Sorry: since we are being serious about our nation’s defence and have a passing affection for the public’s opinion, we have always said that we are committed to the minimum credible independent nuclear deterrent, which we believe is best delivered through a continuous at-sea deterrent. It would require a substantial body of evidence for us to change that view, but the review published today does not appear to offer such evidence. We will continue to scrutinise today’s report on the grounds of capability, cost and disarmament. Labour will also continue to look at ways in which a minimum, credible, independent nuclear deterrent can

be delivered most efficiently, based on protecting our capability, delivering value for money and advancing disarmament objectives.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

566 c969 

Session

2013-14

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top