UK Parliament / Open data

Dog Control Bill [HL]

Debate on bills on Friday, 24 April 2009, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Redesdale. The answering member was Lord Davies of Oldham.
Dog Control Bill (HL). Lords second reading debate. Agreed to on question and committed to a Committee of the Whole House.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

709 c1689-704 

Session

2008-09

Legislative stage

Second reading

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Dog Control Bill (HL).
Friday, 12 December 2008
Bills
House of Lords

Proceeding contributions

Lord Marlesford | 709 c1692 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, is it possible to identify a breed of dog by DNA?
Earl of Shrewsbury | 709 c1693 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I declare an interest as a follower of field sports and as an owner of working dogs. This ...

Show all contributions (13)
Lord Redesdale | 709 c1689-92 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, this Bill has been brought about with the support of a large number of groups involved wit...
Lord Tyler | 709 c1693-5 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am delighted to welcome the Bill on behalf of my colleagues. We congratulate our noble f...
Earl Cathcart | 709 c1696-8 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, at the outset, I should declare that I am a dog owner and either am or have been a member ...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 709 c1698-701 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, like other speakers in the debate I appreciate this important Bill from the noble Lord, Lo...
Lord Redesdale | 709 c1702 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have taken part in this short debate. In one respect, I am qui...
Lord Redesdale | 709 c1702-4 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I apologise to the noble Earl. The noble Earl raised the issue of the control of dogs fall...
Lord Redesdale | 709 c1692-3 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, that is a difficult question. If the noble Lord wishes to become an expert on this issue, ...
Lord Redesdale | 709 c1689 (Link to this contribution) That the Bill be read a second time.
Back to top