UK Parliament / Open data

Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill

Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bills on Thursday, 5 July 2007, in the House of Lords.
Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill. Lords Committee stage first day. Part 1 of 2 records. Clause 1 agreed to.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

693 c1135-63 

Session

2006-07

Department

Department for Communities and Local Government

Legislative stage

Committee stage

Procedure

New clauses

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber

Related items

Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill. Brought from the Commons. Explanatory Notes HL Bill 74-EN also published.
Wednesday, 23 May 2007
Bills
House of Lords
Strong and prosperous communities: the local government white paper in 2 volumes.
Thursday, 26 October 2006
Command papers
House of Commons

Proceeding contributions

Baroness Andrews | 693 c1161-2 (Link to this contribution) I hope I can reassure noble Lords that the power to direct is not as sinister as they have made it s...
Viscount Eccles | 693 c1161 (Link to this contribution) The use of the power to direct raises constitutional as well as practical issues. It has always been...

Show all contributions (46)
Baroness Scott of Needham Market | 693 c1160-1 (Link to this contribution) We support the spirit of the amendment. While there is a strong case for unitary councils in many ar...
Baroness Scott of Needham Market | 693 c1163 (Link to this contribution) I was just considering the relationship of these clauses with later clauses, such as Clause 8 which ...
Baroness Andrews | 693 c1162-3 (Link to this contribution) I always enjoy may/shall debates and it has come early in the Bill. Amendments Nos. 10, 11 and 13—I ...
Baroness Scott of Needham Market | 693 c1162 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 10: 10: Clause 2, page 2, line 37, leave out ““may”” and insert ““shall”” The...
Baroness Hanham | 693 c1162 (Link to this contribution) The Minister is saying that if a local authority decides to seek unitary authority for a county or d...
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin | 693 c1163 (Link to this contribution) I suggest that now is a convenient moment to adjourn the Committee stage and begin again at 2.28 pm....
Baroness Andrews | 693 c1158 (Link to this contribution) Clearly, I would not want noble Lords to struggle with confusion on this issue. I shall write to nob...
Baroness Andrews | 693 c1159 (Link to this contribution) No. The invitation process that we set out is very clear. All that we are saying is that in the proc...
Baroness Hanham | 693 c1159 (Link to this contribution) Inserted in the Bill in the other place was the limitation of 25 January 2008 on any invitation or d...
Baroness Andrews | 693 c1159 (Link to this contribution) I am not saying that. I was saying that the timescale imposed was only on directions. These two thin...
Baroness Hamwee | 693 c1159 (Link to this contribution) I shall just add to the mix of questions on the points on which it would be helpful to have further ...
Baroness Scott of Needham Market | 693 c1159 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 8: 8: Clause 2, page 2, line 33, at end insert— ““(c) in relation to any propo...
Lord Hanningfield | 693 c1159 (Link to this contribution) I am pleased that the Minister will clarify this matter, but I am sure that we will come back to it,...
Baroness Andrews | 693 c1160 (Link to this contribution) So we are dealing simply with Amendment No. 8. That is fine. I can give the noble Baroness a fairly ...
Baroness Hanham | 693 c1160 (Link to this contribution) I support Amendment No. 8. I shall speak to the clauses stand part questions in their place and not ...
Baroness Scott of Needham Market | 693 c1160 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for the clarity of her reply. Some people will be reassured by that an...
Baroness Andrews | 693 c1158 (Link to this contribution) At Second Reading, my noble friend Lord Hunt made it clear that we are in no way anticipating a futu...
Lord Hanningfield | 693 c1158 (Link to this contribution) Like the noble Baroness, Lady Scott, I am more confused. I am totally against changing county bounda...
Baroness Andrews | 693 c1157 (Link to this contribution) I can give a swift answer to that, but the intention of the amendment is obviously to limit the kind...
Baroness Scott of Needham Market | 693 c1157-8 (Link to this contribution) I have to confess to being more confused now than I was to start with. I understand why, in its orig...
Lord Hanningfield | 693 c1156 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 3: 3: Clause 2, page 2, line 9, leave out paragraph (c) The noble Lord said: ...
Baroness Hamwee | 693 c1156-7 (Link to this contribution) If we are talking about a limited number of applications or responses to the invitation, which of th...
Baroness Andrews | 693 c1155 (Link to this contribution) It is because we need the power for implementation. The clause enables us to take the process forwar...
Baroness Hanham | 693 c1155-6 (Link to this contribution) We will return to this matter at a latter stage, because I think that I am now more confused than th...
Baroness Andrews | 693 c1153-5 (Link to this contribution) The issues that have been raised in the debate go far beyond the technical amendment. I am happy to ...
Baroness Hamwee | 693 c1155 (Link to this contribution) Will the Minister clarify one point? Early on in her response, she said that the invitation was issu...
Baroness Hamwee | 693 c1149 (Link to this contribution) The amendment seeks to insert ““relevant””, but relevant to whom? The answer should be ““relevant to...
Lord Hanningfield | 693 c1149-50 (Link to this contribution) I support my noble friend. I returned this morning from a local government conference in Birmingham,...
Lord Greaves | 693 c1150-2 (Link to this contribution) I tabled objections to Clauses 2 and 3 stand part in the belief that we needed a short debate about ...
Baroness Scott of Needham Market | 693 c1152-3 (Link to this contribution) I rise to make one or two remarks in view of the fact that my noble friend will not be objecting to ...
Lord Graham of Edmonton | 693 c1143-4 (Link to this contribution) The tenor of the debate is interesting. The noble Baroness, Lady Sharp, more than once used ““insult...
Baroness Andrews | 693 c1144-6 (Link to this contribution) I thank the noble Lord, Lord Greaves, for his kind words. I am delighted to be back at the Dispatch ...
Lord Greaves | 693 c1146-8 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to everyone who has spoken and to the Minister for a great deal of what she has said, ...
Baroness Hanham | 693 c1148-9 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 2: 2: Clause 2, page 2, line 5, leave out ““or direct any”” and insert ““a rel...
Lord Hanningfield | 693 c1142-3 (Link to this contribution) We are having quite a long debate on this first amendment, but perhaps we can get some of the issues...
Baroness Scott of Needham Market | 693 c1138-9 (Link to this contribution) I support my noble friend’s amendment because it goes to the heart of the issue that we on these Ben...
Viscount Eccles | 693 c1139-40 (Link to this contribution) I rise to add to the probing. The Statement and the Green Paper were clear in their analysis and des...
Lord Greaves | 693 c1136-8 (Link to this contribution) No, I am not offering, but if the Government want my advice on anything at any time, it is freely av...
Baroness Sharp of Guildford | 693 c1140-1 (Link to this contribution) I support the amendment tabled by my noble friend Lord Greaves. I became interested in devolution wh...
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer | 693 c1141-2 (Link to this contribution) I support the amendment of my noble friend Lord Greaves. I cast my mind back to when the Labour Gove...
Baroness Andrews | 693 c1135 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do now resolve itself into Committee on this Bill. Moved acc...
Lord Greaves | 693 c1135-6 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 1: 1: Before Clause 1, insert the following new Clause— ““Devolution of powers...
Baroness Hanham | 693 c1160 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 9: 9: Clause 2, page 2, line 37, leave out ““or direction”” The noble Barones...
Viscount Eccles | 693 c1153 (Link to this contribution) I want to draw attention to a particular situation. What is proposed is also affecting people who ar...

Subjects

Community development
Devolution
Local government
Local government finance
Non-departmental public bodies
Improvement and Development Agency for Local Government

Legislation

Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill 2006-07

Link

View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk
Back to top