UK Parliament / Open data

Welfare Reform Bill

Debate on bills on Monday, 19 March 2007, in the House of Lords.
Welfare Reform Bill. Lords Report stage. Concluded. Bill printed as amended. (HL Bill 54). Part 3 of 3 records.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

690 c1095-134 

Session

2006-07

Legislative stage

Report stage

Procedure

New clauses

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Welfare Reform Bill. As amended on Report.
Monday, 19 March 2007
Bills
House of Lords
Welfare Reform Bill. As amended in Grand Committee.
Thursday, 1 March 2007
Bills
House of Lords

Proceeding contributions

Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 690 c1108-9 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, what a powerful case that was. I have little to add to it. We debated this at some length ...
Lord Best | 690 c1105-8 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 81: 81: Clause 29 , page 20, line 21, at end insert— ““( ) The appropriate max...

Show all contributions (57)
Lord Low of Dalston | 690 c1104 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, that is encouraging and reassuring. I draw particular comfort in relation to my first and ...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 690 c1102-4 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Low, for giving us a chance to talk about these important iss...
Lord Low of Dalston | 690 c1100-2 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 68A: 68A: Schedule 4 , page 76, line 13, leave out paragraph (b) The noble Lo...
Lord Skelmersdale | 690 c1102 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, this amendment allows me to probe how ESA will affect claimants currently receiving benefi...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 690 c1099 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I undertake to write to the noble Lord on those. On Question, amendment agreed to.
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 690 c1099-100 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendments Nos. 53 to 68: 53: Schedule 4, page 74, line 31, leave out ““an existing benefit”...
Lord Skelmersdale | 690 c1099 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, my three questions were about Amendment No. 57, about paragraph 11 in total and about why ...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 690 c1099 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the noble Lord has been assiduous in pursuing these details. He is quite right. I am sure ...
Lord Skelmersdale | 690 c1099 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, before the Minister sits down, would he agree to write to me on those various points? I re...
Lord Skelmersdale | 690 c1097 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, that offer is most gratefully accepted, but I am concerned about the Minister’s use of the...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 690 c1098 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank the noble Lord for his points. On his suggestions about the drafting of these amen...
Lord Skelmersdale | 690 c1098 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, as the Minister said, these are extremely technical amendments. Perhaps he would care to l...
Lord Skelmersdale | 690 c1095-6 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 51: 51: Clause 25, page 19, line 12, leave out paragraph (b) and insert— ““( )...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 690 c1096 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank the noble Lord for moving his amendment, which would make regulations under Clause...
Lord Skelmersdale | 690 c1096 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, it is an enormous restriction.
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 690 c1096-7 (Link to this contribution) Well, my Lords, we shall see quite how significant the restriction is. The scrutiny of legislation i...
Lord Skelmersdale | 690 c1121 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, it is getting late; my maths is never up to scratch but it is even worse than usual. I am ...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 690 c1117-8 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, this clause seeks to introduce an incentive to households evicted for anti-social behaviou...
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 690 c1118 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, we welcome that announcement. What will be the timing? What is the period before the sunse...
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 690 c1117 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the National Housing Federation, Shelter and Citizens Advice believe that these sanctions ...
Lord Skelmersdale | 690 c1119 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 36: 36: Clause 11, page 9, line 39, leave out ““and how”” and insert ““, how a...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 690 c1118 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the intention is not to be able to go beyond the pilots. The pilots are for two years and ...
Lord Skelmersdale | 690 c1118-9 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am most grateful to the Minister for that. Pressure in both Houses and from outside orga...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 690 c1115 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am sorry to interrupt, but I was remiss in not responding to the question asked by the n...
Lord Best | 690 c1114-5 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Oakeshott, and my noble friends Lord Listowel and Lo...
Lord Skelmersdale | 690 c1116-7 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 82: 82: Clause 30 , leave out Clause 30 The noble Lord said: My Lords, I sugg...
Lord Best | 690 c1115 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, it is very generous of the noble Lord to say ““notwithstanding the outcome”” of what follo...
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 690 c1109-10 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, this has been a problem for many years. We have made some movement on the shared room rent...
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 690 c1110 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the noble Baroness was probably not in Grand Committee when we discussed this exact point....
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 690 c1110 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I entirely accept that some local authorities will quickly spend over 100 per cent; others...
Earl of Listowel | 690 c1110-1 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I strongly support my noble friend’s amendment. It can be difficult for a young person to ...
Lord Northbourne | 690 c1111-2 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I support the Government in wanting to save the taxpayer money. Indeed, I also support the...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 690 c1112-4 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Best, has no need to apologise for tabling an amendment at this hour,...
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 690 c1132-4 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, it is clear that not everyone on these Benches has been convinced, but I thank my noble fr...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 690 c1132 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am sure that there are some people who would take a different view. I am expressing the ...
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope | 690 c1132 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, Professor Genn is not an interested party to this. I think her views were slightly differe...
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 690 c1131 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, will the report be produced for Parliament or will it be made public?
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 690 c1130-1 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I start by thanking the noble Lord, Lord Oakeshott, for his kind comments and by trying to...
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 690 c1130 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I wonder whether I could make one brief point, as this is probably my last chance to speak...
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope | 690 c1127-30 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, this has been departmental unfinished business for a number of years, as I know to my cost...
Lord Skelmersdale | 690 c1130 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, inclined as I am to agree with the thinking behind these amendments, it is only fair for m...
Lord Taylor of Holbeach | 690 c1125-6 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank the Minister for that full exposition of the situation. Amendment No. 85 has been ...
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin | 690 c1125 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am happy to do so. In that case, accepting Amendment No. 85 would mean that regulations...
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 690 c1126-7 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 87: 87: After Clause 48, insert the following new Clause— ““Social Security Ad...
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin | 690 c1126 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 86: 86: Clause 40, page 34, line 26, leave out from ““a”” to end of line 27 an...
Lord Addington | 690 c1122 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the principle of protecting data is important. The general point that has been raised is i...
Lord Taylor of Holbeach | 690 c1121-2 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 84: 84: Clause 40 , page 33, line 4, after ““information”” insert““, excluding...
Lord Skelmersdale | 690 c1125 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, this is a proposed affirmative resolution to a totally different part of the Bill. Therefo...
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin | 690 c1122-5 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I hope I can do that without going on for too long. First, I will speak to government Amen...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 690 c1131-2 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I confirm what I have said: the Government will make public their conclusions. I hope that...
Lord Skelmersdale | 690 c1121 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I notice that on this occasion the noble Baroness did not use the word ““overkill””. I agr...
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin | 690 c1120-1 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am delighted to have the opportunity to discuss the amendment further this evening. Clau...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 690 c1104-5 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendments Nos. 69 to 80: 69: Schedule 4 , page 76, line 38, leave out sub-paragraph (4) ...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 690 c1097-8 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 52: 52: Schedule 4, page 74, line 23, leave out ““an existing benefit”” and in...
Back to top