Draft SI on Scotland Act 1998 (transfer of functions to the scottish ministers etc) (no 2)(SI 2006/1040). Lords debate on motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Grand Committee off the floor of the House (Moses room)
Scotland Act 1998 (Transfer of Functions to the Scottish Ministers etc.) (No. 2) Order 2006
Debates on delegated legislation on Wednesday, 22 March 2006,
in the House of Lords,
led by Lord McKenzie of Luton.
The answering
member was Lord De Mauley.
About these Parliamentary proceedings
Reference
680 c140-5GCSession
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeRelated items
Scotland Act 1998 (Transfer of Functions to the Scottish Ministers etc) (No 2) Order 2006
Tuesday, 28 February 2006
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Tuesday, 28 February 2006
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Statutory Instruments Joint Select Committee. Twentieth Report, together with memoranda on SI 2006/92
Wednesday, 8 March 2006
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords
House of Commons
Wednesday, 8 March 2006
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords
House of Commons
Proceeding contributions
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 680 c140-2GC (Link to this contribution)
rose to move, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Scotland Ac...
Earl of Mar and Kellie | 680 c143GC (Link to this contribution)
I welcome this order, which is devolutionary in trend, but it is still going to leave energy partial...
Show all contributions (15)
Baroness Carnegy of Lour | 680 c142-3GC (Link to this contribution)
My noble friend asked the Minister one or two pertinent questions, at least one of which I was going...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 680 c144-5GC (Link to this contribution)
I thank noble Lords for their contributions to the debate on this order. I shall try to deal with as...
Duke of Montrose | 680 c145GC (Link to this contribution)
Does the Minister have an answer to my question about whether the Government expect Scotland, having...
Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 680 c142GC (Link to this contribution)
I thank the Minister for explaining the purpose of the order, although I have to question whether it...
Duke of Montrose | 680 c143-4GC (Link to this contribution)
Will the Minister clarify one or two points for me? I find it interesting that the measure we took t...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 680 c145GC (Link to this contribution)
In that case, perhaps I may write to the noble Duke on that as well. There is certainly nothing in t...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 680 c145GC (Link to this contribution)
We do not see this as encouraging or imposing any greater responsibility on Scotland. Obviously the ...
Lord De Mauley | 680 c142GC (Link to this contribution)
I thank the Minister for explaining the order clearly and at such length. Bearing in mind the broade...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 680 c145GC (Link to this contribution)
Perhaps I may write on each of the issues that might be impacted by this conundrum. I hope that will...
Baroness Carnegy of Lour | 680 c145GC (Link to this contribution)
I am interested in how the requirement to consult is transferred by an order which I do not think ha...
Duke of Montrose | 680 c145GC (Link to this contribution)
I may have jumped the gun slightly. I think there is a bigger question involved around the Esk, on t...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 680 c145GC (Link to this contribution)
I believe the position is that it derives from the Section 36 procedure. This is an existing procedu...
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-02-08 19:19:42 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_55827
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_55827
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_55827