The Minister could undoubtedly answer my query and deal with my anxiety. A significant regulatory issue is involved in the provision of regulations that will work for commissioners in the Department of Health, and he knows that that is the case. It is not a question of what we intend to do; it is a question of what those in the European legal system will make of the function and the nature of what we have set up. If they interpret it as an association of undertakings, that is exactly how they will treat it, regardless of what the Bill says or of what the Minister says at the Dispatch Box. This is a matter of concern that has been raised by people who are more knowledgeable about such matters than I am, and it genuinely needs to be addressed.
Lords amendment agreed to.
Lords amendments 2 to 10 and 13 to 30 agreed to, with Commons financial privileges waived in respect of Lords amendments 7 and 21.
Question put, That amendment (a) to Lords amendment 31 be made.
The House divided: Ayes 233, Noes 313.
Health and Social Care Bill (Programme) (No. 4)
Proceeding contribution from
John Pugh
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 20 March 2012.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Health and Social Care Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
542 c705 Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 16:13:46 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_819340
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_819340
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_819340