I used a slightly bad example in my previous intervention by citing a big business and talking about McDonald's; my point was the vicarious polluter pays. Let us imagine that a small business, such as a café, is set up on the streets of St Albans, and around its tables there is an increase in litter. Surely the reasonable presumption is that its customers have produced it and, therefore, that the café will have written into the cost of creating the cup of tea and sticky bun a cost to cover clearing up the litter.
London Local Authorities Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
James Gray
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 25 January 2012.
It occurred during Debate on bills on London Local Authorities Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
539 c366 Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 15:09:44 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_803902
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_803902
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_803902