The hon. Gentleman is making a thoughtful speech. On the question of public lavatories—I find it difficult to use the word ““toilet”” myself; I prefer ““lavatory””; interestingly, the heading of the clause refers to ““toilets””, but the body of the clause uses ““lavatory””—does he not agree that the provision will lead to regressive taxation? There is no question but that we all want public lavatories to be readily available; the question is how we pay for that. Does the local authority pay for it as a responsibility under council tax or should it be the users who pay? If the cost were £1, £2 or £5, that would be a regressive tax. I do not mind paying that for a lovely, splendid, gleaming public lavatory, but what about the poor young family on benefits with five children? What will they do?
London Local Authorities Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
James Gray
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 25 January 2012.
It occurred during Debate on bills on London Local Authorities Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
539 c362 Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 15:10:59 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_803893
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_803893
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_803893