The hon. Gentleman is extremely unfair to local authorities in suggesting that the clause exists for the convenience of officials. In fact, it is designed to ensure the best use of public money. He will be aware that local authorities have experienced substantial reductions in their budgets, so is he happy that they would have to expend even more resources to enforce the legislation when the clause offers a perfectly appropriate alternative way of ensuring that there is not an accumulation of litter outside public buildings, and would benefit the local community? It seems to be a good use of public money, and—
London Local Authorities Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Chris Williamson
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 25 January 2012.
It occurred during Debate on bills on London Local Authorities Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
539 c333 Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 15:04:41 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_803758
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_803758
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_803758