UK Parliament / Open data

Protection of Freedoms Bill

I cannot guarantee the last bit from the Minister—that this issue is over for this Committee or for the progress of this Bill. This is a matter of constitutional importance to this House and an issue between the Government and Parliament. The Government had a choice. When the Information Commissioner ruled that this information on the register of risks was relevant to the passage of this Bill, he made a very important constitutional point. By denying the House that information, the Government are asking the House of Lords to consider a Bill without the information that it needs to do so. We are not saying that any third party should seek to stop the passage of any legislation—and I am perfectly happy to take advice and redraft the amendment. But the Minister has completely failed to address the constitutional point that it raised here, which is not about the Health and Social Care Bill but about what happens if an Information Commissioner says that some information is relevant to the passage of legislation through this House and any Government deny it to the House. That is a very serious matter indeed. Of course, I will withdraw the amendment, but I do not think that the matter ends here or that it is limited to the Health and Social Care Bill. Amendment 151E withdrawn. Amendment 151F not moved. Clause 101 : Meaning of ““publicly-owned company”” Amendment 151G Clause 101 : Meaning of ““publicly-owned company”” Amendment 151G Moved by

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

734 c44GC 

Session

2010-12

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords Grand Committee
Back to top