Health and Social Care Bill

My Lords, I speak to Amendments 330, 333 and 334 in this group. I draw attention to issues important for strengthening integrated working in children’s health and well-being. Of course, integration is important for all consumers of health, but services for children have often been fragmented and disconnected, sometimes with tragic results, as we all know. I spoke last week about the importance of listening to the voice of the child. If children had a voice, they would say—as they do when we speak to them—that integration of services is not good in many areas. It should be, for effectiveness and efficiency. My amendments require all health and well-being boards to promote close, integrated working between health, social care, and health-related services in their area. Specifically, Amendment 330 requires that they ““must,”” rather than ““may””, include in their joint health and well-being strategy, "““a statement of their views on how arrangements for the provision of health-related services in the area of the local authority could be more closely integrated with arrangements for the provision of health services and social care services in that area””." Amendment 333 requires, again, that they ““must,”” rather than ““may””, "““encourage persons who arrange for the provision of any health-related services in its area to work closely with the Health and Wellbeing Board””." Amendment 334 requires that they ““must,”” rather than ““may””, "““encourage persons who arrange for the provision of any health or social care services in its area … to work closely together””." As the Bill stands, health and well-being boards’ role in bringing health and social care together with health-related services is optional. The National Children’s Bureau and its Every Disabled Child Matters campaign believe this role must be strengthened so that there is a clear duty on all health and well-being boards to promote joined-up commissioning and delivery of services in their area. This is particularly important for children and young people for three key reasons. One reason is that joint working across local agencies is crucial for children’s and young people’s health and well-being. Integrated planning is particularly important for children and young people, for whom some of the most effective interventions are those delivered through non-health settings and services, such as schools and colleges, children’s centres, and youth services. For example, the national evaluation of Sure Start found that a child with access to a children’s centre—formerly Sure Start local programmes—had more immunisations and fewer accidents than young children living in other areas. School health initiatives can have a positive impact on pupils’ health and behaviour—I am thinking of health-promoting schools, for example. However, evidence suggests that health, social care, education, early childhood, youth and other services are not always working in partnership to secure good outcomes for children and young people. The Marmot review identified the lack of consistent partnership working between such bodies as the barrier to delivering services that reduce health inequalities. Similarly, the Kennedy review highlighted the fact that the requisite links between the NHS, social care, education and criminal justice services to support juvenile people are not always made. His report recommended that local partnerships covering all services for children should have, "““a duty to ensure that local organisations work together””." Close working between local partners is particularly vital for children with complex needs, such as disabled children or looked-after children, who need co-ordinated interventions from a range of services. A recent report from the Every Disabled Child Matters campaign found that families of disabled children often report experiences of fragmented service delivery and have been caught between services that do not communicate well. One parent has said: "““As a parent, you just want a service, but it’s like health, education and social care are all separate and they don’t really like working together. What you need as a family is one system—not three””." The Government have expressed aspirations for better partnership working across a broad range of children’s services. For example, Support and Aspiration, the special educational needs and disability Green Paper, states, "““we want to make it easier for professionals and services to work together, and we want to create the conditions that encourage innovative and collaborative ways of providing better support for children, young people and families””." I believe that unless the Bill strengthens the framework for local integration, the ability of local areas to implement these aspirations will be undermined. The Bill contains many key measures promoting joined-up working on health and social care, through relationships between local authorities and NHS commissioners. However, many of the services that promote the health of children and young people, such as schools and colleges, children’s centres and youth services, are or will be provided by bodies which are independent of the local authority or NHS. Health and well-being boards should have a mandatory and not an optional role in promoting the involvement of these health-related services in joined-up commissioning and delivery. Schools need to be encouraged and enabled to play their part. Schools are key partners in securing the health and well-being of children. The public health White Paper, for example, recognises the role that schools can play, stating that: "““Good schools will be active promoters of health in childhood and adolescence””." This is crucial for reducing health inequalities. The Marmot review, again, recommends that schools should take a ““whole child”” approach and they will be unable to do this without routine engagement with partners from other agencies. Over 1 million children and young people now attend academies, which are independent of local authority oversight and will not be represented by health and well-being boards. According to the Department for Education, more than 40 per cent of all secondary schools are now open or are in the process of opening as academies. The Government have taken a step towards promoting joint working by dropping proposals in the Education Act to remove the duty to co-operate under the Children Act 2004. However, this Bill does not create the structural environment within which co-operation with education providers will be possible. Health and well-being boards have the potential to act as a forum for schools to fulfil this duty to co-operate. A clearer role for health and well-being boards in bringing a broader range of services together beyond health and social care, as provided by these amendments, should help to secure this. Finally, health commissioners should be supported to meet their new duties on integration. Duties were introduced, following the listening exercise, for the NHS Commissioning Board, clinical commissioning groups and Monitor, whereby they are required to carry out their functions with a view to securing that the provision of health services is integrated with the provision of health-related services. As the Bill stands, the role of health and well-being boards in securing this integration remains an optional part of their remit and the scope of their local strategy. Health and well-being boards are expected to play a role in holding health commissioners to account for securing services that fulfil priorities set out in the joint health and well-being strategy. Furthermore, health commissioners will need a forum through which to drive forward better joint working and integration with health-related services. Without a guarantee that health and well-being boards would prioritise encouraging this close working across health, social care and health-related services, there is a serious risk that health commissioners’ new integration duties will be ineffective. I hope that, in this Bill, the Government will take note of issues which will affect children. I know that the noble Earl, Lord Howe, is listening and I hope that on Report we can reach some agreement on children’s health and well-being.