UK Parliament / Open data

Protection of Freedoms Bill

My Lords, one always knows about one-third of the way into a sentence that a ““but”” is coming. I anticipated it when the noble Lord, Lord Dear, started to make his comments. I entirely agree with the noble Baroness, Lady Berridge, about the application of these provisions. That is a safeguard, but it seems to me that it is more of an answer to the noble Lord, Lord Dear, than it is to me. Of course I understand the practical problems. I said a few minutes ago that all the amendments are probing. The problem often is that when one tables an amendment to probe, it is taken as if one means every word. I am looking for an answer to my underlying question and I am not sure that I have yet heard it. What worries me is that even on the fairly narrow track that the noble Baroness, Lady Berridge, identified, there is the possibility of driving a coach and horses through what we all think we are agreeing this afternoon. I do not seek to apply more bureaucracy, but I do seek clarity. I am not yet clear, but there are more stages and I will not make more of a nuisance of myself at this stage. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 5 withdrawn. Clause 2 agreed. Clause 3 : Persons arrested for or charged with a qualifying offence Amendment 6 Clause 3 : Persons arrested for or charged with a qualifying offence Amendment 6 Moved by

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

733 c154 

Session

2010-12

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Back to top