UK Parliament / Open data

Education Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 24 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bills on Education Bill.
My Lords, I am grateful for the response from noble Lords. The accolades predicted by my noble friend Lady Walmsley were not heaped on me in quite the numbers I might have hoped for, particularly from the noble Baroness, Lady Hughes of Stretford, but I am grateful for the ones that I received. I am grateful to noble Lords for helping me get to this position. In response to the point made my noble friend Lady Walmsley, which also picks up on one of the points raised by the noble Baroness, Lady Hughes of Stretford, yes, with regard to future legislation to do with SEN and trying to bring about greater partnership, there clearly would be consultation with noble Lords in the way that my noble friend suggested were any future change to be proposed. Whether it is or not, I do not know. Time will tell, in the context—which I think noble Lords welcomed—that we should look at this issue in the round, in terms of our plans for trying to encourage greater partnership working. That is something we are keen to do. On the specific question asked by the noble Baroness, Lady Hughes of Stretford, about academies, I can assure her that it will apply to all the types of academies. On the guidance, it was our view that the 100 or so pages of statutory guidance, and, indeed, the regulations around the children and young people's plan, were overly proscriptive. Those requirements went last August, as the noble Baroness, Lady Hughes, said. I am not certain that their departure has been enormously noted. The key point is that, with the duty now in place, local authorities will be able to develop effective plans with partners that reflect local priorities. The Children Act 2004 sets out the overarching requirement for the local authority, for schools and other partners to co-operate to improve children's life chances—through joined-up planning, for example. We think that local areas will be able best to judge what should be in their plans. I know that there were a couple of other important points that the noble Baroness raised. As I do not want to get anything wrong, I will, if I may, follow that up with her in correspondence. Amendment 62 agreed. Clause 31 : Duties to have regard to children and young people's plan Amendment 63 Clause 31 : Duties to have regard to children and young people's plan Amendment 63 Moved by

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

731 c636-7 

Session

2010-12

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Back to top