UK Parliament / Open data

Education Bill

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Verma (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 4 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bills and Committee proceeding on Education Bill.
If the noble Lord will allow me to continue, I am hoping that I will be able to respond to the questions that he has raised. The system of student support would be much less progressive as a result of the noble Lord’s amendment. The Government remain committed to delivering a progressive system whereby those who benefit most from higher education contribute the most. With regard to imposing the cap, the noble Lord asked if the current £15,000 threshold would have risen in 2016 compared with the £21,000 threshold proposed by the Government. Of course he knows that the previous Government did not raise the threshold annually, which is why we are proposing from 2016-17, as part of the progressive system, that it be introduced. The noble Lord, Lord Peston, asked about the impact on women. It is important to consider the package in the round. The amount that borrowers repay in a year is strictly linked to income. Borrowers whose income drops below the threshold, for example, when moving to part-time work or seeking downgrade posts at the end of their career, or who leave employment for whatever reason, will be protected because their repayments will cease immediately.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

730 c302GC 

Session

2010-12

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords Grand Committee
Back to top