I beg to move,"That the Order of 31 January 2011 (Health and Social Care Bill (Programme)) as supplemented by the Order of 21 June 2011 (Health and Social Care Bill (Programme) (No. 2)) be varied as follows:""1. Paragraphs 5 and 6 of the Order shall be omitted.""2. Proceedings on Consideration shall be taken on the days shown in the first column of the following Table and in the order so shown.""3. Each part of the proceedings shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion at the time specified in relation to it in the second column of the Table."
TABLE
| Proceedings |
Time for conclusion of proceedings |
| First dayNew Clauses and New Schedules relating to, and amendments to, Parts 3 and 4 other than:(a) New Clauses, New Schedules and amendments relating to transitional arrangements for NHS foundation trusts,(b) New Clauses, New Schedules and amendments relating to private health care, and(c) amendments providing for commissioning consortia to be known as clinical commissioning groups. |
8.30 pm on the first day. |
| New Clauses and New Schedules relating to, and amendments to, Parts 3 and 4, which relate to transitional arrangements for NHS foundation trusts or to private health care;amendments providing for commissioning consortia to be known as clinical commissioning groups. |
10.00 pm on the first day. |
| Second dayNew Clauses, New Schedules and amendments relating to the provision of information, advice or counselling about termination of pregnancy. |
One and a half hours after the commencement of proceedings on consideration on the second day. |
| Remaining New Clauses and New Schedules relating to, and remaining amendments to, Parts 1, 2 and 5 to 12; remaining proceedings on consideration. |
6.00 pm on the second day. |
"4. Proceedings on Third Reading shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion at 7.00 pm on the second day on which proceedings on consideration are taken."
I will speak briefly to the programme motion, as I am sure that all hon. Members who wish to take part in debate on the Bill would like to make progress and get on to the main core of the amendments before us. As they will see, we have set in train our plan to hold Report and Third Reading over two days, commencing now and continuing until 10 pm tonight, and resuming on Wednesday, after Prime Minister's questions and any other business that takes place during that day. As is normal, Third Reading will take place an hour before the end of that day.
As we are all aware, we arrive at Report with the Bill having received extensive scrutiny in two House of Commons Committee stages. Our first Committee stage, in February and March this year, lasted 28 sittings. It was the longest Committee stage of any Bill since the Criminal Justice Bill of 2002-03. At the conclusion of proceedings, even the hon. Member for Halton (Derek Twigg), who led for the Opposition in that Committee, acknowledged that"““every inch of the Bill””––[Official Report, Health and Social Care Public Bill Committee, 31 March 2011; c. 1310.]"
had been"““scrutinised””."
Following a listening exercise and the work of the Future Forum, the Bill was re-committed to a further Committee stage of 12 sittings. If that had been a stand-alone Committee stage, it would have been the longest for any Bill sponsored by the Department of Health since 2003. All that means that the Bill has been scrutinised for a total of over 100 hours, and has been the subject of 40 Committee sittings—more sittings than there has been for any public Bill between 1997 to 2010. I will dwell on that point for a moment, and remind hon. Members of recent Health Bills that predate this Government.
The Health Act 2009 was scrutinised over eight sittings, as was the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008. The Bill Committee for the Health and Social Care Act 2008, which among other provisions set up the Care Quality Commission, sat for 12 sittings, a number matched by the Health Act 2006. As the keener mathematicians among us might have realised, the total number of Commons Committee sittings for these four Bills was 40—the same number as for this single Bill. In these 40 sittings we had a great number of debates where the issues were fully debated, sometime more than once.
Having had such substantial debate in Committee, we feel strongly that two days on Report is a thoroughly appropriate length of time. I have heard the calls from certain Opposition Members that more time is needed. I find that intriguing, given the rarity with which two-day Report stages were granted under the previous Government.