UK Parliament / Open data

Localism Bill

Proceeding contribution from Robert Neill (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 18 May 2011. It occurred during Debate on bills on Localism Bill.
In theory, a Mayor could seek to disregard a local authority's views, but in practice we reckon that the new clause makes that unachievable. There are two reasons for that. First, the Mayor will have to consult the local authorities, which will have registered their objection. As with any public law decision, he has to behave in a way that is rational and reasonable within the terms of the Associated Provincial Picture Houses v. Wednesbury Corporation case. Secondly, because of the electoral arrangements in London, the local authority would be well placed to ensure that a blocking majority was created in the assembly to prevent the policy from going through. There is a theoretical possibility that the Mayor would be able to create the sort of rogue corporation that one might be concerned about, but in reality it is pretty much inconceivable.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

528 c372 

Session

2010-12

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber

Legislation

Localism Bill 2010-12
Back to top