UK Parliament / Open data

Postal Services Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Whitty (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 4 May 2011. It occurred during Debate on bills on Postal Services Bill.
My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness for those reassurances. Behind them is a recognition that some reporting provisions need to be laid down and maintained. The main disappointment in her response was the reference to not accepting the need for separate reporting for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. As we said before dinner when debating an amendment in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Rogan, the situation is somewhat different. The criteria need to be universal, but it is also important that the particular positions of Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland must be focused on. There are some fudges at the border, but they are relatively small, and it is important that the Post Office network is seen as part of the social provision of the Government, particularly in remote rural areas, for the rural population and rural businesses. The devolved Administrations have a role in that. Therefore, it is very useful for them to have a separate reporting provision. This does not mean that the criteria should be significantly different, but it does mean that the kind of problems that meeting those criteria may create in those countries could perhaps be devolved by wider rural and social policy in those areas. I would be disappointed if the final form of reporting did not allow for separate or parallel reporting to the devolved Administrations. Subject to that caveat, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 40 withdrawn. Amendments 41 to 45 not moved. Amendment 46 Moved by

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

727 c550-1 

Session

2010-12

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Back to top